Skinfold Body Fat (3-Site) Calculator
Enter your sex, age, and three skinfold measurements (men: chest/abdomen/thigh, women: triceps/suprailiac/thigh).
Result
How it is calculated
Enter the three skinfold thicknesses in millimetres and your age in years. The three boxes are labelled only 1st, 2nd and 3rd site, so use the order of the sites for your sex: men chest, abdomen, thigh; women triceps, suprailiac, thigh. With S = the sum of the three, body density is D = 1.10938 − 0.0008267·S + 0.0000016·S² − 0.0002574·age for men and D = 1.0994921 − 0.0009929·S + 0.0000023·S² − 0.0001392·age for women. Body fat is then given by the Siri equation %BF = 495 ÷ D − 450. Any sex other than female uses the male formula. Folds must not be negative and age must be above zero. The result is an estimate, not a medical measurement.
Worked example
A 30-year-old man has chest 10 mm, abdomen 20 mm and thigh 15 mm. The sum is S = 45 mm. Density = 1.10938 − 0.0008267 × 45 + 0.0000016 × 45² − 0.0002574 × 30 = 1.10938 − 0.03720 + 0.00324 − 0.00772 = 1.0677 g/cc. Siri: 495 ÷ 1.0677 − 450 = 463.61 − 450 = 13.61. The tool shows body fat of 13.61%, a sum of 45 mm and a density of 1.0677 g/cc. A woman of the same age with the same three numbers (triceps, suprailiac, thigh) would get 19.06% because her equation differs.
Common mistakes
- Measuring the wrong sites. The formula assumes chest, abdomen and thigh for men and triceps, suprailiac and thigh for women; entering, say, a biceps fold gives a number that looks valid but is wrong.
- Entering the fold in centimetres or inches. All three must be in millimetres; 1.5 cm is 15.
- Entering a single reading rather than the usual practice of repeated measurements. A fold taken once, or taken with a different pinch each time, makes the result jump by several percentage points; take each site again and average.
- Choosing the wrong sex. The two equations give clearly different answers for identical folds (13.61% against 19.06% here), so the setting matters.
- Reading the body fat as precise. It is a regression estimate from skin folds, so treat small week-to-week changes with caution and always measure at the same sites and time of day.
Sources
- Generalized equations for predicting body density of men — Br J Nutr, 1978 (Jackson & Pollock; 2004 reprint)
- Generalized equations for predicting body density of women — Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1980
About this calculator
The Jackson-Pollock 3-site skinfold equation estimates body density from three caliper measurements — chest, abdomen and thigh for men; triceps, suprailiac and thigh for women — combined with age in a regression formula, since body fat distribution and skin compressibility both shift with age. That body density is then converted into a body fat percentage using the Siri formula (%BF = (495/density) − 450), which models the body as a two-compartment system of fat mass and fat-free mass with different known densities.
This calculator takes your sex, age and the appropriate three skinfold measurements and returns your estimated body fat percentage using the Jackson-Pollock and Siri equations together. Personal trainers and strength coaches tracking client body composition over time, exercise science students learning field-based body composition methods, and athletes monitoring fat mass changes during a training cycle use it as a low-cost, portable alternative to DEXA or hydrostatic weighing, with the caveat that accuracy depends heavily on consistent, well-trained caliper technique.
Was this helpful?
You can pick up to 3 reactions.
Popular calculators
Loan Calculator
Monthly payment, total interest and full amortization schedule.
Percentage Calculator
Percent change, percent of, and ratio calculations.
Discount Calculator
Calculate final price, savings, and discount amount.
BMI Calculator
Body mass index from height and weight (metric or imperial).
Age Calculator
Compute your exact age in years, months and days from a birth date.
Compound Interest Calculator
Calculate the final amount and interest earned with compounding.
All Calculators
- Loan Calculator
- Profit Calculator
- Discount Calculator
- BMI Calculator
- Percentage Calculator
- Ideal Weight Calculator
- Age Calculator
- Pregnancy Due Date Calculator
- Compound Interest Calculator
- BMR Calculator (Basal Metabolic Rate)
- Tip Calculator
- Fuel Cost Calculator
- Date Difference Calculator
- Sleep Cycle Calculator
- Daily Water Intake Calculator
- Simple Interest Calculator
- Heart Rate Zones Calculator
- Running Pace Calculator
- Pet Age Calculator
- Calories Burned Calculator
- Macro Calculator
- TDEE Calculator (Total Daily Energy Expenditure)
- Waist-to-Hip Ratio Calculator
- Honor Roll Calculator
- One Rep Max (1RM) Calculator
- Ovulation Calculator
- Electricity Cost Calculator
- Unit Price Calculator
- Savings Goal Calculator
- Break-Even Point Calculator
- Paint Calculator
- Course Grade Average Calculator
- Business Days Calculator
- Time Duration Calculator
- Fuel Economy Calculator
- Temperature Converter
- Tile Calculator
- Aspect Ratio Calculator
- Roman Numeral Converter
- Goal Weight Timeline Calculator
- Salary Converter (Hourly to Annual)
- Credit Card Validator (Luhn)
- Body Surface Area (BSA) Calculator
- Feels-Like Temperature Calculator
- Ohm’s Law Calculator
- PPI (Pixel Density) Calculator
- Molar Mass Calculator
- Zodiac Sign Calculator (Western + Chinese)
- IBAN Validator
- Shoe Size Converter
- Country Info & Dialing Code Lookup
- Time Zone Difference (World Clock)
- CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) Calculator
- Rule of 72 Calculator
- Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) Calculator
- Lean Body Mass (LBM) Calculator
- Pythagorean Theorem Calculator
- Speed Converter
- Download Time Calculator
- Date Calculator (Add/Subtract)
No calculators found
Comments (1)
Caliper error moves this number more than you might expect. On the preset male values, reading each of the three folds just 1 mm too high lifts the result from 13.61% to 14.50%, close to a full percentage point. Mark the sites, use the same pinch pressure and take the average of repeated readings, then compare like with like over time rather than chasing a single figure. Which of the three sites do you find hardest to measure consistently?